6d486f49
27 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
27 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
category: Theory
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
Currently, Chrono CCG has no real mono support. No card that improves it's quality if you only play cards from one
|
|
syndicate, no card that forces mono play, nothing that even mentions the concept.
|
|
|
|
Now, the biggest obvious reason to not play mono is your doubling your card pool selection, increasing the amount of
|
|
synergies you can make, give yourself access to more powerful tools and threats, and also just adding cognitive burden
|
|
on your opponent in ladder as they have more cards to play around given the standard blind deck format.
|
|
|
|
So based on these assumptions and past card games, you would view no reason to go mono, but I believe there is one. The
|
|
diver system. Two cards you are always guaranteed to have in your opening hand, and in theory, the greatest amount of
|
|
synergy between cards should be cards within the same syndicate.
|
|
|
|
Examples:
|
|
|
|
In Phasetide, [[Fervent Follower]] and [[Shattersmith]] are two cards you always want in your opening hand as the chance
|
|
for them to have value lessens over time.
|
|
|
|
In Singularity, [[Efficient Scrapbot]] and [[Enhanced Retriever]] with get you a strong start in draw and add some
|
|
blockers or potential let you get in some early damage.
|
|
|
|
In Splittergleam, [[Persistent Squire]] and [[Toothy Pugilist]] so you always have some bleed creators.
|
|
|
|
|